BLOWING OUT THE COBWEBS

Spring cleaning, Chicago style. 

MY TOLERANCE HAS VANISHED

For the booze, that is. I used to drink like a fucking champion. One time, in band camp...wait, no. But one time I drank a half of whiskey within an hour. John Belushi style. Didn't even bother with a shot glass.

I've gone through periods of soberness, but nothing like now. And although it's because of my totally sober boyfriend, I'm not trying to get better for me, but for me. That being said, when I do drink, I drink like a fish starving for water. Like I used to.

Funny thing is though, I can't hang like I used to. Either it's the slow ageing process, or "maturity", or the legal system (I'm literally not allowed to legally drink) when I do...I'm a FUCKING PUSSY. And coming from a long, long line of heavy drinkers, this is not easy to admit, let alone accept.

Working in a bar hasn't helped, nor has the court ordered outpatient therapy (that I'm still paying off), but the few AA meetings has, actually, brought me some peace of mind. I refuse to believe that I will never have another drink, because I'm sure I will. I just wonder if there is a "right" way to do so.

Probably not.

SHOULD CHICAGO GET THE 2016 OLYMPICS?

This morning I read yet another in the seemingly endless news reports regarding the possibility of Chicago being awarded the 2016 Summer Olympic Games. Apparently Obama has made no plans no attend the conference in Copenhagen next month to make a final push to bring the games to his adopted hometown. This is either confidence on his part, that it's all but a done deal, although I like to think he has more pressing concerns at the moment. That being said, the heads of state for the other candidates, Madrid, Rio and Tokyo will be present.

Despite the incessant local media coverage, which focuses almost exclusively on the financial aspect of putting on the games (and rightfully so), the 2016 Olympic bid doesn't seem that major of a topic of discussion amongst ordinary Chicagoans; to wit, my friends and I rarely discuss the possibility. And when it does become a topic of discussion, audible groans emanate from anyone within earshot. This reluctance is the result of many factors, of which I will discuss in a moment.

The fact remains, we shall learn of our fate in no less than 20 days, October 2, to be exact. And assuming we get them...2016 might seem like a long way aways, but really, IT'S ONLY 6 YEARS. If I was to take the temperature of Chicagoans, and I won't pretend to, but if I had to guess, it seems most people have resigned themselves to the probability that we will get them.

Now, under most circumstances, being awarded perhaps the most prestigious events, one that puts it's host city on a world stage, would seem like an unqualified windfall - providing benefits both tangible (i.e. economic) and not (i.e. pride). People in the far corners of the world will suddenly learn how to pronounce the word "Chicago", and that's pretty dope. Overall it's a massive boner of an ego boast.

All that being said, if you asked me right now if I, as a resident of Chicago want the 2016 Games, my answer would be easy: NO FUCKIN' WAY! Here's why...

-$$$

Our infamous Overload, I mean, Mayor Richard J. Daley likes to make statements like "tax money isn't paying for it". He also suspects the games will make money for the city. We eat a lot of his shit, but how he was able to say that in front of reports and news cameras, with a straight face...boggles my tiny mind. Give me a fucking break. Every time Daley wants to build something GRAND, the city taxpayers always ends up getting raped in the ear to help pay for the "unintended" cost over runs. In fact, the city council just gave Daley a "blank check".

-CONSTRUCTION

From an economic perspective this can be viewed as a tremendous benefit, as it will certainly create a lot of jobs. And that's great - and I'll be happy to dig a ditch or pour concrete (or really anything short of prostitution at this point). But can you imagine what a CLUSTER-FUCK this city would become? The amount of work that would have to take place to get ready, in only 6 years will effectively hold us residents hostage, not to mention people that visit here. Ultimately, there will be positive, and much needed improvements to our infrastructure will be made. But pushing 20+ years of projects into a 6 year time frame...DISASTER a la Cloverfield.

-TRAFFIC

They call this the "City That Works", in fact, that robust slogan used to be painted on the sides of every CTA rail car back in the 70's/80's. It's was a farce then and is now. Ever traveled on the Kennedy Expressway, from O'Hare to Downtown on a Friday afternoon? Case in point. If you think traveling 15 miles should take in excess of hour, well, have I got a city for you! The Red Line trains at Rush Hour? Dear Lord. My point is, if they expect to cram a few more million visitors into a city that barely transports the people that are already here, well, that's going to take a lot of work (see above).

-CORRUPTION/POLITICS

For all the reasons listed above, the 2016 Games will provide ever so many ways for our city, county and state politicians to line their pockets. I imagine that every night any local politician's head hits their pillow, they fall asleep licking their lips and wake up with raging hard-ons thinking of the fat fucking golden goose about to be deposited into their laps. And the real estate developers will make prohibition gangsters look like pussies.

-DISTRACTION

Far and way, this is my principal concern. Don't get me wrong, in spite of all it's faults I love the ever living shit out of this city. But I worry that all the planning and resources needed to get the Games of the ground will come at the expense of things that obviously need dire attention. The schools, crime, health care, etc are all kinds of fucked up. What happens if the city diverts the majority of their police/fire presence from the wards the Games? What would that mean for the rest of us that actually live here?

-SECOND CITY STATUS

It should be irrelevant at this point, but there are still some traces of "Second-City-Itis", which is the feeling that no matter how great of a city Chicago is, it isn't nor ever will be as great as New York City. I'd like to think this is an illness common among the monied set, but I fear it is shared by those that grew up here and then fled "for greener pastures". Pssssh. It's true that Chicago is no New York City, but that's what I like about Chicago. The Games are not going to thrust us ahead of NYC, no matter how hard Daley tries. It's a fools errand.

If I was a professional handicapper (and I'm anything but, nor am I a betting man) I'd say Chicago is neck in neck with Rio. No way would they hold the games in Madrid so soon after London has them in 2012. And seeing as Beijing just had them, I doubt they would give 2016 to Tokyo. If memory serves they have never held the games in South America, right? So maybe Rio has a slight edge. I dunno.

What I do know, is that when and if we get the 2016 Games, I am getting the FUCK outta' Dodge and going camping in Northern Wisconsin for a few weeks. Maybe I can rent out my place to tourists at a wildly inflated sum! Hmmm...maybe I'm coming around after all.

SIX OR ONE HALF DOZEN

Perhaps a more important question is, where will I put my shoes?

Last Monday I posted an ad online to rent out the spare room in my place, and within hours, I received about a dozen responses. A few were dismissed outright for various reason (no recent divorcees...thank you for the reply, but I don't need to deal with that emotional baggage) others for serious syntax errors, and a few more just because they didn't seem to have their shit together.

That being said, two replies seemed ideal for what I'm looking for, and even after talking to oth at great length last night, I am still undecided, but I need to make up my mind right quick, as I told both interested parties that I will let them know tomorrow who has won the elusive (and potentially regrettable) "prize" of being my New Roomie.

Candidate #1

"Seth" lives in Colorado and is a junior transferring to attend a semester at a University in Chicago this fall. He's straight, has a girlfriend, and seems a bit quirky (like I'm not?) but overall seems like a cool guy. He's only looking to live here for 6 months, and is ready and willing to FedEx me a check for August's rent even though he may not arrive until the end of that month.

He also is bringing nothing except himself and his clothes. He's literally looking for a place to crash, do homework and cook food. Though he has a handful of friends in Chicago, he seems intent on spending as much time as he can checking out the music scene and the general Wicker Park/Bucktown area. He seems low maintenance and has "no problem living with a gay dude". Word.

Candidate #2

"Anni" lives in New York City and just spent a year living in France teaching English (they still do that there?). She is coming to Chicago to take classes at Second City and/or I.O. and seems really...fun. Unlike #1, she seems genuinely excited about living in a vintage Chicago apartment. Also, she "loves the gays" and counts several of her friends as such (does she have any hot friends?).

She's looking to relocate here for the long term and as such wants a 12 month commitment. I suspect she is inclined to decorate, and seems to have something to actually add to the place. Not that I really care about that, but still, her enthusiasm is infectious. Oh, and she likes to cook! Yum!

Bottom Line:

I can't make up my mind. Both seem really cool and I clicked with both instantly (via phone at least) and both need a place SOON. And I need to find a New Roomie since rent, gasoline and utilities are putting a serious crimp on my wallet.

Ugh, decisions! Either way, I think things will work out well, which is sorta the problem. I'd rather live with a guy, even a straight one, but #2 seems like a lot more fun, plus she will totally click with 2 of my neighbors that are into the theater scene. I think I might just flip a coin...